Competitive research gets a bad rap in financial services.
It’s often treated like a benchmarking exercise. Something you do to validate where you are—or to get permission to play catch-up. But the point of competitive research isn’t to be the best of the banks.
Competitive research isn’t about catching up. It’s about seeing what’s coming.
It’s to break out of the narrow view of what’s “expected.”
When we conduct competitive research, we’re not just looking for gaps. We’re looking for signals—of category shifts, rising customer expectations, and changing definitions of value. Done right, it’s not reactive. It’s proactive.
Because great competitive research doesn’t just show you what the industry is doing. It reveals what the industry is on the verge of doing.
We look at how:
These aren’t just best practices. They’re indicators of what people will soon expect everywhere.
Copying isn’t strategy. Anticipation is.
But there’s a catch: looking at competitors isn’t the same as copying them.
Too often, we see competitive research reduced to mimicry. A chart that says, “They’re doing X—we should too.” That kind of thinking keeps your brand in second place.
Instead, we use it to push the Brief:
Competitive research should expand the boundaries of the strategy—not shrink it.
It should force better questions:
Competitive insight is your roadmap. Not your script.
And it should build a roadmap—not a reaction.
Because when you see trends early, you can shape how they show up in your brand experience. You don’t just join the conversation. You help define it.
That’s what strategy is supposed to do.
Want to raise the bar on what’s possible? Use competitive research to see the shifts coming—and act before they define the category.
Want to get work that really matters for you and your business? Let’s talk.
Email Us